Amid efforts to emphasize inclusion in addition to diversity, many corporations have struggled to accurately track and measure the sometimes-ambiguous concept of “inclusion.” Diversity—often measured via individuals’ self-reported identities and shared via pie charts and bar graphs—has for decades served as a straightforward metric for companies to assess what they have called “D&I” (or diversity and inclusion) efforts. In reality, point-in-time or longitudinal demographic data are largely only indications of diversity, not inclusion—not to mention that such data typically only includes percentages of a workforce who identify as a specific gender identity (male, female, or nonbinary) and race or ethnicity (for example, Latinx or Black/African American), let alone everyone else. However, assessing progress around inclusion has shown to be more difficult.
Are you acting with bias? You could find out by taking the Implicit Association Test1, a social psychology method of measuring the strength of associations that people have between concepts as well as evaluations and stereotypes.2 Many people have used this test to identify their natural tendencies of bias.
Deloitte research shows that in the last five years, urgency around diversity and inclusion (D&I) has increased by 53 percent.1 The workforce is becoming increasingly diverse, and the business case for the impact of D&I on critical business and talent outcomes (e.g., higher productivity, profitability, and customer satisfaction) has been established.2 But despite several decades of having D&I initiatives in place, close to 40 percent of organizations reported that they don’t attain the anticipated value from their efforts in this area.3 What can organizations do to address this?
Continue reading “5 lessons to launch inclusion”
Part 3 of 5
Crafting the employee experience: An ongoing series
As our Simply Irresistible Organization™ model shows (see below), there are five essential elements of employee engagement success: meaningful work, supportive management, positive work environment, growth opportunity, and trust in leadership. In this article (the third of five, you can read the first two here), we’ll discuss the issue of a positive work environment.
Posted by Juliet Bourke on May 10, 2016.
Five years ago I started reading everything I could find on the topic of diversity of thinking and decision making. There was a lot more opinion than fact, so I started doing my own research too. And, because I work in consulting, my team and I did a lot of our research in real workplaces. So our ideas are thoughtful and practical.
I made mistakes—the biggest one was to think that diversity of thinking was a substitute for capability. It’s not. You can’t just put a whole lot of people into a room who know nothing about a topic and assume that diversity of thinking will plug those knowledge gaps. Take it from me—I tried it, it doesn’t work.
With all the press we read about diversity, inclusion, women in leadership, and the need to be open-minded about religious and cultural differences, one might ask “Is 2016 going to be the year of diversity in business?” Yes, I believe so: this topic has been raised in the public eye, and a broad range of research1 indicates that inclusive and diverse businesses outperform their peers by a significant margin. If you aren’t taking this topic seriously, you should be.
Continue reading “Lessons from our research: Ways to build a diverse, inclusive organization”
Posted by Stacia Sherman Garr on April 2, 2014
Today at IMPACT 2014: The Business of Talent, we’re launching new Bersin by Deloitte research on Diversity & Inclusion (D&I) nine months in the making. Our study of 245 organizations with operations in North America, 56 percent of which are global or multinational, reveals no shortage of good intentions when it comes to fostering an inclusive culture. Execution and results, however, are lagging.